Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 July 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.


Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill

Amendments Nos. 216C, 216D and 216E in this group stand in my name and are all designed to achieve the same end. I congratulate those who deal with amendment groupings, whom we never see but from whom we receive many e-mails during a Committee day. As I prepared for today’s debate, I thought that I really should have sought to amend ““may””. However, I find that my noble friend has done so in an amendment in this group. Sometimes we are told that ““may”” really means ““must””—that it is a slightly politer way of saying ““must””—or that it means ““may”” but you must be reasonable about it, which amounts to ““must””. However, I do not read it in that way in this instance. Like my noble friend, I feel that publication is important. I support his points. I shall not need to move my amendments.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c220 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Contracts Crime Audit Councillors Anti-social behaviour Best value Byelaws Audit Commission County councils Housing Finance Legislative competence Functions District councils Local government Powers Public participation Parish and town councils Local government executive Police community support officers Voluntary organisations Social rented housing Overview and scrutiny committees
Legislation
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk