Proceeding contribution from Lord Hylton (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on UK Borders Bill.
UK Borders Bill
I support this amendment because I am concerned that Clause 31(1)(b) simply says, "““who is convicted in the United Kingdom of an offence””." I suspect that that is going too wide. I am slightly surprised at the moderation of the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, in wanting to put in only two years; I think a case could be made out for putting in five years. I very recently came across a case of an asylum seeker who had made the mistake of taking a job in this country, no doubt completely out of ignorance. For that he was convicted and served a prison sentence—I am not sure how long—and was then detained presumably in preparation for deportation. The commission of technical offences should not be a kind of fast-track to deportation. I hope that the Government will have second thoughts about this.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 694 c132GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Asylum Detainees Crimes against the person Age Finance Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Human trafficking Migrants Immigration officers Offenders Protection Powers Prisoners Victims Dungavel House Immigration Removal Centre Yarl's Wood Immigration Removal Centre Border and Immigration Agency
- Legislation
- UK Borders Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:48:51 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413068
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413068
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413068