Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on UK Borders Bill.


UK Borders Bill

I am very surprised to hear the Minister say that fraud and counterfeiting cannot attract a sentence of as much as two years. I would have thought that the maximum sentence must be considerably more than that for either of those offences. Other offences for which the maximum is very much greater include theft, for which the maximum is 10 years. Theft can be a fairly minor offence, but the maximum sentence obviously covers a whole range of conduct, including acts that are perfectly trivial and others that are very serious. Fraud and counterfeiting are similar. I would be very surprised if the maximum sentence did not allow for a wide variation in the acts that were brought before the courts. Some acts would justify a sentence of imprisonment of at least two years. I am also very surprised that the Minister did not address my main argument that there are now three separate definitions under Section 72 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c134GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Asylum Detainees Crimes against the person Age Finance Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Human trafficking Migrants Immigration officers Offenders Protection Powers Prisoners Victims Dungavel House Immigration Removal Centre Yarl's Wood Immigration Removal Centre Border and Immigration Agency
Legislation
UK Borders Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk