Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 July 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill
I am very grateful to the noble Baroness, as I was, incidentally, for her remarks on Amendments Nos. 242H and 242J, which usefully explained the meaning of those parts of the clause, which I had, I must admit, misconstrued. I note what the noble Baroness said about public consultation. I agree that the public may not be the only audience for consultation exercises and that there are other groups who would, in the normal course, be included. I wanted to flag up the undesirability of an overly narrow consultation exercise. That, as a matter of custom and practice, would be equally undesirable. I thank the noble Baroness for her reply. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn, [Amendments Nos. 242H to 242J not moved.] Clause 233 agreed to. Clause 234 agreed to. Schedule 17 agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 694 c682
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conflict of interests Health services Local government NHS Patients Public participation Patients' forums Local involvement networks
- Legislation
- Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:12:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413575
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413575
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413575