Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 July 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill
moved Amendment No. 246C: 246C: After Clause 238, insert the following new Clause— ““Abolition of statutory codes of recommended practice as regards publicity Section 4 of the Local Government Act 1986 (c. 10) (codes of recommended practice as regards publicity) is repealed.”” The noble Lord said: In the absence of my noble friend Lord Hanningfield, I shall take on the burden of moving this amendment, which I hasten to add for the Minister’s ease is an exploratory amendment, perhaps to give her an opportunity to take some action over the Summer Recess, which would help local government greatly. The amendment would repeal Section 4 of the Local Government Act 1986 and the code of practice in relation to publicity, which is now a generation old. Some extraordinary characters bestrode the stage of local government in those days, and life—as I remember very well—was on occasions extremely interesting; but it was not always in the best interests of the public. I am bound to say that everything that I observe today about the present generation of councillors shows that they are far more responsible and do the job in a much more reasonable way. The code of practice was devised in those days to be somewhat restrictive, but the whole process of how councils have worked as a consequence of a raft of legislation has made them much more flexible. They must now work much more by getting public consent for what they are doing. The local area agreements, which we have proposed in this Bill, will dramatically widen that need for consultation. It has got to the point when the code of practice in this field is too restrictive and it would be very useful if it could be relaxed. That is the simple purpose of this amendment—to put to the Minister that we have an opportunity to do something about this, and there is plenty of time to do it because the Recess is coming. If she could give some assurance that she will consider this matter and see whether something can be done about it when we meet again in the autumn, it would be very encouraging for everybody. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 694 c861
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Community development Councillors Bureaucracy Devolution Expenditure Local government Local government finance National Assembly for Wales Publicity Local government executive Standards Wales Social rented housing Waste management Local Government Ombudsman
- Legislation
- Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-19 14:27:08 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414215
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414215
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_414215