Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Hilary Benn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 8 October 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Foot and Mouth/Bluetongue.


Foot and Mouth/Bluetongue

Yes. The epidemiological report that was published suggested that the lesions in the animals at infected premises 5 could have been three or possibly four weeks old. That gives us part of the answer to the question that we all asked on 12 September—where has the virus been for a month and a bit? The answer was that it had been outside the original protection and surveillance zone, undetected and, as a result, unreported. That reinforces the point that inspection is the first line of defence and it fills in a gap in the timeline. That is what has transpired, and I am not interested in pointing a finger at anyone else in relation to this issue: as I said to the hon. Member for Eastleigh (Chris Huhne), I want to fix it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
464 c48 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Bureaucracy Finance Exports Disease control Foot and mouth disease Government assistance Livestock Meat Marketing Transport Hill farming Beef East of England Livestock industry Institute for Animal Health Surrey Bluetongue disease National fallen stock collection and disposal scheme
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk