Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill
My Lords, once again, this is a most welcome amendment. I thank the Minister for agreeing to it, and for her comments about it. My only question is about the use of ““may”” in proposed new subsection (2), rather than ““shall”” or ““must””. I hope that the Minster will not take this question as poor thanks for her troubles in any way: is it the Government’s intention to include in the regulations a provision in respect of each of the matters listed in proposed new subsection (2)(a) to (d)? I hope that the answer is yes, otherwise why include this list in the first place? It would be helpful to have that assurance on the record.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 695 c923
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Crime Councillors Administration Health services Health authorities Ethics Local government Misconduct Patients Police Membership Payments Parish and town councils Local government executive Rural areas Mayors Local area agreements Local involvement networks Crime and disorder reduction partnerships
- Legislation
- Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:39:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418677
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418677
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418677