Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord West of Spithead (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 24 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].


Serious Crime Bill [HL]

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 155 to 159. These minor and technical amendments make it clear that only senior HMRC officials can authorise the use of intrusive surveillance powers. The amendments were made in response to opposition concerns. The Government were asked whether it could be made clearer precisely who is mandated by the provisions. A similar concern was raised when your Lordships considered the provision. As my noble and learned friend Lady Scotland said, we think that sufficient internal and external safeguards on the use of these powers exist, but the Government recognise that the internal safeguards are not obvious in the legislation. It is important that there is public confidence in the use of these intrusive powers. The amendments were made in response to ongoing concerns. Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 155 to 159.—(Lord West of Spithead.) On Question, Motion agreed to. 160: Leave out Schedule 13


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
695 c1117 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Crime prevention Appeals Crime Companies Crimes of violence Assets Costs Business Corporate manslaughter Fraud Evidence ICT Liability EU law Insolvency Electronic commerce Proceeds of crime Monitoring Privy Council Surveillance Right of search Serious crime prevention orders
Legislation
Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk