Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 29 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on select committee report on Energy: Radioactive Waste Management (S&T Report).


Energy: Radioactive Waste Management (S&T Report)

My Lords, I, too, welcome the report. Indeed, it seems to be an almost biennial report. I see from the notes that the first was in 1998-99, the second was in 2001-02, the fifth report was in 2003-04 and this is for 2006-07. I welcome the report, recognising that we will all be back here again in 2008-09 or 2009-10 looking at the same issue. It is an excellent report, and the Clerk is to be commended for making such a dry subject readable. I have one issue, which is a housekeeping point. I wish that in Science and Technology Committee reports, acronyms were listed at the front. There are rather a few acronyms in here. The noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, has noted that he has problems with the NDA; when I started to read the report I forgot that it meant the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, and I read it in the business sense of a non-disclosure agreement, which is an unfortunate linkage between the two bodies. On these Benches, we have always been anti-nuclear. The noble Lord, Lord Tombs, who I seem to follow regularly in these debates, will be happy to know that we have not changed our position on that.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
695 c1233 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accountability Public appointments Radioactive waste Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Parliamentary scrutiny Location Training Security Storage Waste management Committee on Radioactive Waste Management Geology
Legislation
Energy Act 2004
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk