Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Selborne (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 29 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on select committee report on Energy: Radioactive Waste Management (S&T Report).


Energy: Radioactive Waste Management (S&T Report)

My Lords, the whole House, and particularly the members of the committee who participated in the preparation of this report, will be grateful to the Minister for his very full and helpful reply. I believe he said that he thought his response might be inadequate, but he should be assured that 36 minutes provided an absolutely excellent response. I want to reflect one last message from this debate, which I agree has been incredibly useful. If there is to be public confidence in the institutional responsibility for radioactive waste management, which there must be, we need the components of transparency, continuity of management over very long timescales—by which we mean millennia, a long time by anyone’s standards—high-quality science and accountability. A number of noble Lords said in relation to the existing and evolving proposals for agencies and committees—I recognise that the Government have responded already to some—that if it were possible to simplify and improve accountability, and therefore public acceptability, then clearly such measures should be adopted. I thank everyone who has participated in the debate. On Question, Motion agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
695 c1247-8 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accountability Public appointments Radioactive waste Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Parliamentary scrutiny Location Training Security Storage Waste management Committee on Radioactive Waste Management Geology
Legislation
Energy Act 2004
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk