Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 December 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL].


Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL]

We have proposed that the definition of ““human cell”” should include cell lines. I would therefore imagine that ““cell”” equalling ““cell lines”” is within the Bill, but I will come back to the noble Lord with clarification on this issue shortly. In the mean time, the group of amendments covers some important matters which define to what entities and biological material the controls in the Bill apply, and what some of these controls should be. The Government are prepared to reconsider the details of the relevant provisions, and will continue their dialogue with stakeholders on these matters—and, of course, with all noble Lords present today. I thank all noble Lords for their vital contributions on these matters and ask the noble Lord, Lord Patel, to withdraw his amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
696 c1515-6 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Fertility Human embryo experiments Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Ethics Parents Medicine Research Stem cells Human-animal hybrid embryos
Legislation
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk