Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 6 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Local Transport Bill [HL] Bill.
Local Transport Bill [HL] Bill
Does the Minister accept that there are occasions, and this may be one of them, where it would probably be better either to mention no one in the Bill and leave it all to guidance or to put everyone in? I hope that the Minister will consider that, when it comes to implementing the provision, there may be people who say, ““We’ll do what it says in the Bill, but because these bodies are not mentioned, we don’t have to””. The argument about local choice, flexibility and discretion is right, but it leads me to the conclusion that we would do better to have less in the Bill and more in guidance, rather than decide that one group of people or organisations should be outside.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 696 c41GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Children Devolved matters Bus services Accidents Fares Finance Driving Planning Public transport Pollution control Railways Network Rail Scotland Standards Training Transport Safety Roads Road traffic control Traffic Commissioners Tendered network zones
- Legislation
- Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:28:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_427406
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_427406
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_427406