Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Monson (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].


Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]

Although I understand and to a considerable extent sympathise with the argument put by the noble Lord, Lord Higgins, if it is the case that the holders of dormant accounts will genuinely be no worse off when the balance has been transferred to a reclaim fund than they would have been if it had not been so transferred, are we really justified in imposing such burdens on banks and building societies? The larger banks and building societies could afford it, but for the smaller building societies to have to take up quarter-page advertisements in the whole national and much of the regional press is asking too much. I should be grateful to hear the Minister’s comments on that.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c18GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Charities Assets Bank services Banks Building societies Insurance Interest charges Pensions Lotteries Repayments Taxation Big Lottery Fund
Legislation
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk