Proceeding contribution from Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 December 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Climate Change Bill [HL]
I cannot see the benefit of leaving it in. What do we lose by removing the reference to 60 per cent? We gain credibility, because it points to the fact that we are going to accept a higher figure, but what do we lose?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 697 c180
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Climate change Carbon dioxide Environment protection Environment Government departments International cooperation EU emissions trading scheme Prime Minister Ministerial responsibility Pollution Pollution control Carbon emissions Climate Change Committee
- Legislation
- Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:38:27 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429283
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429283
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429283