Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 12 December 2007. It occurred during Opposition day on Northern Rock.


Northern Rock

May I move on? I have been generous with interventions. At this point, it will be useful to summarise why the Liberal Democrats have taken the position we have. I shall then develop in more detail comments on the financing of the company as it now is and discuss the options. Of course it would be desirable for us to start from somewhere else. The financial shock that hit the markets a few months ago was unprecedented and unexpected, but that does not excuse the Financial Services Authority, the regulator, which should surely have spotted the high risk associated with Northern Rock's reckless expansion. None the less, the event was unexpected. We reacted to it by supporting what the Government did to stop the run—that is, guarantee deposits. That was a sensible reaction. At the time, I opposed an open-ended unconditional loan to bail out the banks. Ever since the Government made that decision, they have been digging a deeper and deeper hole for themselves. There is nothing wrong in principle with exploring the idea of trying to get a private bidder, and that is why I do not fundamentally quarrel with some of the interventions from Labour Members. However, it has become painfully and increasingly apparent that, with the money markets now largely closed, it is simply impossible for any of the bidders, however credible or reputable, to raise the amount required, including the money necessary to guarantee the full repayment of the taxpayer. That is our position now.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
469 c375 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Assets Banks Deposits Protection Loans Nationalisation Sales North East Government guaranteed credit Northern Rock
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk