Proceeding contribution from Philip Dunne (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 12 December 2007. It occurred during Opposition day on Northern Rock.
Northern Rock
I recognise that the hon. Gentleman's preference, like ours, is for a private sale. However, in advancing his case for nationalisation over administration, what analysis has he done that leads him to suggest that taxpayers, whom he has just identified as the primary beneficiaries of either of these routes, would do better out of nationalisation—given that they would potentially be taking on all £110 billion of liabilities, plus redundancy liabilities that we have not even calculated yet—than administration, through which they are currently exposed only to £30 billion worth of liabilities?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 469 c381
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Assets Banks Deposits Protection Loans Nationalisation Sales North East Government guaranteed credit Northern Rock
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:39:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429552
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429552
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429552