Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Hoban (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 12 December 2007. It occurred during Opposition day on Northern Rock.


Northern Rock

We said that we would facilitate the passage of any such legislation, but we need to see it first so that we can examine the reforms that the Government propose. We have offered that support but have had no response from the Government. I turn now to the speech by the hon. Member for Twickenham, who is no longer in his place. He did not say how he thinks that nationalisation would improve matters, or set out what he would do if the situation did not improve. He did not detail what his strategy for running the bank would be. Would he want to continue to accept deposits? In his speech today and in previous statements to the House and the media, he has been very critical of Northern Rock's lending practices. Would he want to continue to offer mortgages, or would he close down that aspect of the business? How would he manage the existing book of mortgages? Would he encourage prepayments, or would he roll them over? How much more money is he prepared to put at risk while Northern Rock is in public ownership? Those are all decisions that a nationalised bank and its owners—the Government—would need to make. The hon. Gentleman failed to set out a clear strategy for a nationalised bank. He may have captured the headline, but there is no substance to the soundbite. One thing is crystal clear—it would be a sign of monumental failure if the Government had to nationalise Northern Rock. It would be an indictment of their handling of the crisis. At every step of the way, the Government have demonstrated incompetence. The Prime Minister ignored the proposal from the Governor of the Bank of England for reforming the rules to do with early intervention and deposit insurance. The Chancellor failed to display leadership by not having a plan when it was announced that the Bank of England was acting as the lender of last resort. That triggered a run on Northern Rock, in the face of which the Chancellor dithered over whether to issue a guarantee to depositors. Even when he announced it, he was not sure as to what he had guaranteed. The Chancellor and his aides have sown doubt and confusion in the sale process, keeping options open but remaining unclear about what they are.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
469 c393 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Assets Banks Deposits Protection Loans Nationalisation Sales North East Government guaranteed credit Northern Rock
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk