Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Local Transport Bill [HL].


Local Transport Bill [HL]

I shall also speak to the Question whether Clause 71 should stand part of the Bill. The clauses will allow the Secretary of State to direct a review of respectively non-ITA and existing ITA areas. I will give reasons why we object to both clauses. The ostensible principle of this section of the Bill is to allow authorities to review their governance arrangements in a bottom-up manner. I am therefore uncertain as to why these clauses are needed. Local authorities need to initiate a review themselves to be fully committed to implementing the results that they find. Any imposition will not work and will serve to undermine local authorities, which need to be partners in the recognition and implementation of change. That is especially important in the formation of ITAs, if the formation of ITAs allows the implementation of road charging without the constituent local authority’s consent, through changes to the consultation arrangements or delegation of local authority functions or by conferral of a power to direct an authority. The formation of an ITA through an imposed review should not be used as a mechanism of introducing road charging without local democratic accountability.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c223GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Devolved matters Bus services Devolution Concessions Fares Equality Fees and charges Exemptions Legislative competence Grants Homelessness Public transport National Assembly for Wales Pollution control Passenger transport executives Standards Transport Roads Tolls Traffic Commissioners Carbon emissions
Legislation
Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk