Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rosser (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Local Transport Bill [HL].


Local Transport Bill [HL]

I would have thought that the ITA and the elected members from its constituent councils might be quite good people to decide what was needed as regards flexibility to reflect local conditions and local arrangements. I shall leave that thought with my noble friend as he has said that he will reflect further on the issue. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 80 not moved.] Clause 72 agreed to. Clause 73 agreed to. Clause 74 [Delegation of local authority functions]: [Amendment No. 80A not moved.] Clause 74 agreed to. Clause 75 [ Conferral of a power to direct]: [Amendment No. 80B not moved.] Clause 75 agreed to. Clauses 76 to 96 agreed to. Schedule 5 agreed to. Clause 97 [Abolition of requirement for confirmation of English schemes]: On Question, Whether Clause 97 shall stand part of the Bill?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c234GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Devolved matters Bus services Devolution Concessions Fares Equality Fees and charges Exemptions Legislative competence Grants Homelessness Public transport National Assembly for Wales Pollution control Passenger transport executives Standards Transport Roads Tolls Traffic Commissioners Carbon emissions
Legislation
Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk