Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bob Spink (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 January 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Fuel Poverty.


Fuel Poverty

The hon. Gentleman has secured a very important and timely debate, but the question is not only about introducing more measures. Does he agree that the measures that have already been introduced, such as the excellent Warm Front, need fine tuning? The Warm Front measure is dysfunctional in one particular way. Sometimes, when a boiler needs changing, a Warm Front enforced contractor must be sent to my constituency from London, of all places, and the work can cost £2,500 to £2,700. That requires a top-up from the individual, but they cannot afford the top-up, so they do not get the work done. However, a good, local contractor could do the work for £1,200 or £1,500. Does the hon. Gentleman think that there should be more flexibility to select good, local contractors who can do such work?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
470 c2WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Electricity Fuel poverty Fuels Low incomes Poverty Natural gas Older people Prices Social tariffs
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk