Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Cathcart (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 January 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Climate Change Bill [HL].


Climate Change Bill [HL]

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Teverson, for coming to my rescue and saving me a letter, and I thank the Minister for clarifying his position. It seemed to us that it would be very useful to have an indication of how the devolved Administrations are coming to terms with, and helping to achieve, the UK target—which ones are pulling their weight and which ones are not. The essence was to give us a breakdown of which of the four areas of the United Kingdom were responding favourably, and which not. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 86 and 87 not moved.] Clause 14 agreed to. Clause 15 [Final statement for 2050]: [Amendments Nos. 88 to 93 not moved.] Clause 15 agreed to. Clause 16 [Alteration of carbon budgets]: [Amendment No. 94 not moved.] Clause 16 agreed to. Clause 17 [Consultation on alteration of carbon budgets]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c832-3 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Climate change Carbon dioxide Environment protection Pollution control Standards Carbon emissions Climate Change Committee Carbon budgets
Legislation
Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk