Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jeremy Hunt (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 15 January 2008. It occurred during Legislative debate on National Lottery.


National Lottery

As ever, my hon. Friend has made an excellent point. I think that he is really saying that if the lottery were returned to its original four good causes we would not have a lot of the pain that we are suffering today. The structure that the Government have set up for the lottery gives the Minister the power to determine 50 per cent. of the money from lottery good causes. That has led to a lot of the problems. Some £9.3 billion would be a huge amount if it were simply for 17 days of entertainment. However, if the Olympics can be a catalyst in transforming attitudes to sport, harness the power of grass-roots sport so that men and boys join grass-roots sports clubs rather than gangs, engender a sense of national pride and Britishness, and showcase our sport, which comes from the country responsible for more international sports than any other, perhaps that enormous sum will be more acceptable to hard-working taxpayers. However, that sum will not be acceptable if the Government are not transparent about the budget, if they make charities and voluntary organisations pay the price for their financial incompetence, or if they decimate grass-roots sports clubs—the very organisations that can secure an Olympic sporting legacy. This afternoon, the Government will win the vote, but I hope yet that we will win the argument.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
470 c822-3 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Finance Lotteries National Lottery Olympic Lottery Distribution Fund Olympic Games 2012
Legislation
Payments into the Olympic Lottery Distribution Fund etc. Order 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk