Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Bledisloe (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 17 January 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on House of Lords Bill [HL].


House of Lords Bill [HL]

““Knockabout comedy”” is very flattering, I hope. This is a very carefully crafted Bill, which the noble Lords, Lord Steel and Lord Norton of Louth, have prepared with great care to deal with several short-term problems which virtually everybody accepts need to be dealt with now. We do not wish to be distracted from pursuing that useful aim by vast numbers of red herrings, which have to be tackled some time, but which are not apt to be tackled now. One example of how dangerous it is to go down this route appears in Amendment No. 72, tabled by the noble Earl, Lord Caithness, in which he contemplates that the commission will recommend people not only for membership of this House but also for the bare honour of peerage. If so, why does it not do the same for knighthoods and all other honours? A peerage will then become an honour and have nothing to do with the commission or this House. Do let us get back to the bedrock of this Bill. These amendments and a large number of others deal with interesting topics but not with the substance of this Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c1508-9 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Elections House of Lords Hereditary peers Public appointments Peers Parliament Reform
Legislation
House of Lords Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk