Proceeding contribution from Nicholas Winterton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 28 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty).
Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty)
Further to that point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. In response to an earlier point of order, you made reference to the Modernisation Committee of this House, which considers changes to Standing Orders. You indicated— ... I am not worried about the sandwiches. Mr. Deputy Speaker, you indicated that this was a matter for the Modernisation Committee. As I happen to be the senior Opposition Member on that Committee, let me put this question. If the Government wish to change Standing Orders or their interpretation, should they not, prior to putting a motion to do so before the House, actually refer it to such a Committee of this House? In fact, the House’s integrity and independence, to which Standing Orders make an important contribution, is being affected by the Government business motion. It is an abuse of this House.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 471 c50
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Related items
-
Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty)
Monday, 28 January 2008
Proceeding contributions
House of Commons
- Subjects
- Democracy EU law European Union EU institutions EU reform Powers Referendums Parliamentary procedure Treaties Treaty of Lisbon
- Legislation
- European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-02-25 15:32:13 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439338
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439338
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439338