Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].


Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]

We agree that it is insufficiently clear whether enforcement action includes informal advice and guidance that officers regularly provide to businesses. If it did, that could disadvantage small and medium-sized businesses; they particularly value this informal, sometimes oral, advice and guidance, and that usually leads them to compliance. Not allowing the enforcement authority to give an informal warning might create a system that was all stick and no carrot, and might well incur hostility between the regulators and the regulated. It would also increase bureaucracy—the very opposite of the Hampton principles and the declared deregulatory intentions of the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c227GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Business Fees and charges Exemptions Franchises Local government Powers of entry Small businesses Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
Legislation
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk