Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
The Opposition will never object to a Minister saying, ““We will take that back””. I can think of many people to whom delegation of the functions would be inappropriate—although the noble Lord, Lord Cope, is not one of them; nor is anyone else in this Room. One can think of situations that would appear to be allowed by paragraph 9 and would be extremely undesirable. The paragraph may need some expansion to deal with some different circumstances. It is right to focus on the term ““functions”” and on others. One may need to disaggregate all the thoughts that are encompassed in one and a half lines. I have written down ““R”” for Report, and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Schedule 4 agreed to. Clause 27 [Enforcement action: exclusions]: [Amendment No. 92 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c249GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Business Fees and charges Exemptions Franchises Local government Powers of entry Small businesses Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
- Legislation
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:34:29 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439950
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439950
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439950