Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
My Amendment No. 96 was introduced as a probing amendment and I am grateful for the clarification. Anticipating the point that the Minister made on Amendment No. 98A in relation to what I think he described as the essential—certainly significant—provision regarding notification, LACORS says that it does not see that that adds value as the primary authority cannot stop another local authority acting outside the plan. In addition, a regulated person has a right to complain via a local authority’s complaints procedure, together with other, more extreme, steps. However, we will all consider what the Minister said in that connection and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 97 and 98 not moved.] On Question, Whether Clause 28 shall stand part of the Bill?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c259-60GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Business Fees and charges Exemptions Franchises Local government Powers of entry Small businesses Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
- Legislation
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:39:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439963
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439963
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439963