Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
moved Amendment No. 99: 99: Clause 29, page 13, line 9, after ““may”” insert ““following consultation with LBRO”” The noble Baroness said: I shall speak also to Amendment No. 100A. Amendment No. 100 has been withdrawn: I apologise for it having been tabled in the wrong place. The amendments relate to fees. The first would require the primary authority to consult the LBRO before charging. I can see that having to consult on a case by case basis would not be reasonable. The second would allow the LBRO to give advice to a primary authority about fees. Under Clause 31(2), it can give guidance. I do not know whether we should regard ““guidance”” as being advice or a direction. The amendment is probably covered by that subsection, but I do not know whether Amendment No. 99 is. If the LBRO has not given guidance about fees, will the Minister confirm that the primary authority can proceed without consulting it? I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c264GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Business Fees and charges Exemptions Franchises Local government Powers of entry Small businesses Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
- Legislation
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:34:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439969
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439969
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_439969