Proceeding contribution from Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Transport Bill [HL].
Local Transport Bill [HL]
My Lords, the noble Lord moved his amendment so well, with such eloquence and at such length, that he deserves a full reply from my noble friend—as I can still call him, because he called me so in another place. I was puzzled why the amendment was tabled. It seemed at one level to be a throwback to an earlier view by the Conservative Opposition of the Assembly, but to anyone objective this proposal is four-square within the remit of the devolution settlement. Indeed, any part not within that remit is excluded, namely the traffic signs. Therefore, having hoped to understand the motive for this, I remain puzzled, but I am glad that it will not be pressed.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c631-2
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Disclosure of information Contracts Devolved matters Bus services Finance Large goods vehicles Public transport Taxis Transport Road traffic Wales Roads Wheelchairs
- Legislation
- Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:45:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440794
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440794
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440794