Proceeding contribution from David Heathcoat-Amory (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 30 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on treaty on Treaty of Lisbon (No. 2).
Treaty of Lisbon (No. 2)
The Secretary of State is missing the point. It is nothing to do with social solidarity; this is a specific, new obligation in the treaty to act in solidarity with other member states, both in normal market conditions and at times of crisis. Given that that the obligation is judiciable and can incur infraction proceedings, it is very serious and might—in my view, it will—affect our freedom of choice to supply energy to non-member states, that is, to our other military allies. We might need or decide to do so at the appropriate time. The Secretary of State did not answer that serious point, which has nothing to do with Maastricht as the obligations are new. Can he answer it now?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 471 c327
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Competition EU law Energy Energy supply European Union Pollution control Treaties Treaty of Lisbon EU energy policy
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:44:08 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440872
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440872
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440872