Proceeding contribution from Tony McNulty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on Police Grant.
Police Grant
No, that would be—if I can bore people—a rather churlish interpretation of what I said. What we are talking about most directly is the immediate settlement for the forthcoming year, 2008-09. We have said in the broadest terms, to help rather than hinder police authorities, that there is also an indicative three-year settlement, and so have announced what they are likely to get over the subsequent two years. If work on demographic change, particularly sharp demographic change, such as that which I mentioned in response to my right hon. Friend the Member for Leicester, East (Keith Vaz), or other such items intervened in that process and if we got broad agreement after consultation on changing things in that direction, clearly that change could be forthcoming over the next couple of years. I am therefore not saying, ““This is three years—all shut. Go away, we're not having a police grant debate over the next two years, because it's all settled.””
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 471 c674
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Finance Police Pay Local government finance Workplace pensions Police authorities
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:09:19 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442443
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442443
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442443