Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Ruffley (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on Police Grant.


Police Grant

I take my right hon. and learned Friend's point, which I have debated with the Minister. We would be at one on something as major as the tape recording of suspects' interviews; I hasten to add that that was introduced by a Conservative Administration in the 1980s. I do not think that any Member on either side suggests that safeguards of such importance and magnitude should be tinkered with. The only way in which the Minister would tinker would have my support. A few days ago, he announced a pilot in Lancashire to see whether the clumsiness involved in bagging up cassettes, labelling the bags and all the associated paraphernalia could be avoided and whether the service could be better delivered by digitised recordings. As the Minister knows, I support that pilot. I want to return to the fact that good intentions—and we have had 10 years of them—are not enough; I hasten to add that before 1997 there were good intentions about cutting paperwork. The 2002 promise from the then Home Secretary has not been delivered on. In 2004, a White Paper was produced.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
471 c688-9 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Finance Police Pay Local government finance Workplace pensions Police authorities
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk