Proceeding contribution from Jeremy Browne (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 6 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
The problem with Conservative Members is that when I am trying to talk about the interests of British business, all they seem to be interested in is their hang-up on the issue of a referendum. I risk being pulled up short, but let me try to take the House through the incremental steps in response to the question. Everyone recognises that this issue of the referendum is a rather small aspect of the overall treaty—[Interruption.] I see that the Minister for Europe, who virtually lives in the Chamber nowadays, probably feels that this conversation is taking up another 20 minutes or half an hour more of our time in the days and weeks of debate about the different aspects of the treaty. I would not see this aspect as the linchpin of the treaty. Our view on the referendum issue is that the constitution superseded all previous treaty agreements and that the treaty is different in nature. The content—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 471 c1045-6
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Competition EU law European Union EU internal trade European communities Treaties European Court of Justice Treaty of Lisbon
- Legislation
- European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:29:27 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443824
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443824
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443824