Proceeding contribution from Michael Connarty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 6 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
I have followed the hon. Gentleman's argument against this amendment and for his amendment to amendment No. 195. If he regrets the previous constitution being changed to the new Lisbon treaty, and the removal of the reference to undistorted competition, do the Liberals therefore not support the protocol on services of general interest, which fundamentally changed the previous position on undistorted competition? That seems to be the logic of his argument.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 471 c1046
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Competition EU law European Union EU internal trade European communities Treaties European Court of Justice Treaty of Lisbon
- Legislation
- European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:29:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443829
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443829
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443829