Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 28 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on Business Motion.


Business Motion

I just want to make sure that the House understands the point made by the right hon. and learned Member for Rushcliffe (Mr. Clarke). This motion is complete nonsense. It is unnecessary. If it were necessary, it would be serving to reduce the opportunity for amendments. However, Mr. Speaker, you have ruled that that is not the case and that you had full discretion over the amendments. This motion should therefore not be on the Order Paper. The Government have consulted about the style of dealing with the Bill, but not about the timetable. I am afraid that they have started today badly, because they are not only alienating the people whom they have alienated before by bringing the Bill to the House, but, procedurally, alienating some of their friends who support the Bill but who cannot support this motion or a timetable that has not been carefully negotiated to accommodate all the interests of the House. We shall oppose the motion when it is put to the vote.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
471 c24-5 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
European Union Parliamentary procedure Parliamentary scrutiny Treaties Treaty of Lisbon
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk