Parliamentary Search

Debate on Monday, 28 January 2008, in the House of Commons, led by Jim Murphy. The answering member was Lord Hague of Richmond.

Business Motion

Debate on a motion relating to the themed debate on the Treaty of Lisbon on 28 January. Agreed on division (248 to 204).

Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
471 c23-9, (corrigendum) 296;471 c23-9 
Session
2007-08
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Procedure
Business motions
Timetabling of bills
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Related items
Corrections
Tuesday, 29 January 2008
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Commons
Proceeding contributions
Speaker | 471 c29 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman is quite right—I do have the power when a debate is in progress to allow what is ...
Bob Spink | 471 c25 (Link to this contribution) This motion seeks to limit debate to 10 o’clock tonight, which in view of its importance is quite im...
Show all contributions (19)
Rob Marris | 471 c25 (Link to this contribution) In response to the hon. Member for Castle Point (Bob Spink), I have to say that my constituents woul...
Lord Hague of Richmond | 471 c25 (Link to this contribution) The Minister might have done better to have moved the motion in 10 or 20 seconds rather than partly ...
David Howarth | 471 c29 (Link to this contribution) On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. In the light of the vote that we have just had, may I ask you to i...
Lord Clarke of Nottingham | 471 c24 (Link to this contribution) Will the Minister explain why he seems to be wasting time on a motion on the 10 o’clock rule? We alw...
Simon Hughes | 471 c24-5 (Link to this contribution) I just want to make sure that the House understands the point made by the right hon. and learned Mem...
Jim Murphy | 471 c24 (Link to this contribution) The right hon. and learned Gentleman makes a fair point. The important point, however, is that the h...
Gwyneth Dunwoody | 471 c24 (Link to this contribution) Is the Minister saying that, if anything that we wish to debate is not on the list of subjects that ...
Jim Murphy | 471 c24 (Link to this contribution) Mr. Speaker, I think that you would discourage me from responding to that point until our second deb...
William Cash | 471 c23 (Link to this contribution) I was going to raise a similar point, and I am grateful to you for having ruled accordingly, Mr. Spe...
Jim Murphy | 471 c24 (Link to this contribution) I think that the whole House will thank the hon. Gentleman for fulfilling the unusual role of keepin...
Jim Murphy | 471 c23 (Link to this contribution) Mr. Speaker, with your indulgence, I shall nevertheless give way to the hon. Member for Stone (Mr. C...
Speaker | 471 c23 (Link to this contribution) I have ruled this subject out of order. We shall have to wait and see what the hon. Gentleman says i...
Speaker | 471 c23 (Link to this contribution) Order. The Minister is going beyond the scope of the motion. The business that he is talking about r...
Jim Murphy | 471 c23 (Link to this contribution) The purpose of the motion is to bring our consideration on the main motion to a conclusion by 10 o’c...
Jim Murphy | 471 c23 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move,"That, at this day’s sitting, the Speaker shall put the Questions necessary to dispose...
David Howarth | 471 c23 (Link to this contribution) Can the Minister explain what difference the motion will make and how the business of the House woul...
Notes
Daily Part printing error - insert "Clarke, Mr. Tom" in col. 26 of Division No. 55 in Daily Part 471 c296.
Subjects
European Union Parliamentary procedure Parliamentary scrutiny Treaties Treaty of Lisbon
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk