Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Tebbit (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 February 2008. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Northern Rock.


Northern Rock

My Lords, does the noble Lord not understand that he has just heard the first but not the last request for political interference by the Government in the management of this soon-to-be nationalised business? Does he not understand—all of us who have experience in these matters do understand—that whatever the legislation states, Ministers can interfere with the running of a nationalised industry? The lunchtime directive is about to be reinvented, it seems to me. Does he not agree that the £15 million a year that is to be paid by the Northern Rock nationalised bank will be paid not out of the bank’s profits but out of taxpayers’ money, predominantly taxpayers in the south of the country who pay most taxes, to special interests in the north of the country where the Government have a political interest in maintaining them? Can he say why the Government need powers to amend all banking legislation without primary legislation? What is the reason for that, which I understand is in the Bill?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c34 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Banks Private sector Public appointments Nationalisation Sales Shareholders Northern Rock Northern Rock Foundation
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk