Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill
I am extremely grateful, first, to the noble Lord, Lord Addington, for damning my amendment with what I might describe as faint praise and then to have the faint praise made slightly brighter by the Minister. Many years ago, I inherited a pair of ivory-backed hair brushes, which were beginning to lose their bristles. It looks to me as though my amendment has lost a few bristles in the Minister’s consideration. Having said that, I am well aware—as I was when I tabled the amendment—that what I am proposing as a whole goes somewhat in the direction of overkill. I am glad that the Minister has now put on the record that he will refine this into a sensible affirmative first provision for Clauses 43 and 44. Is that right?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 699 c20-1GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Compensation Absent parents Child Support Agency Credit reference agencies Liability Family courts Industrial diseases Maintenance Parents Payments Mesothelioma Scotland Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
- Legislation
- Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:39:33 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_445900
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_445900
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_445900