Proceeding contribution from Lord Geddes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 21 February 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Wiltshire (Structural Change) Order 2008.
Wiltshire (Structural Change) Order 2008
I am most grateful to the noble Baroness. I have just two points. First, on the ““favourable”” statistics that she cited, if I can call them that—and she is quite right to cite them in the Government’s favour—she mentioned the remark about the Electoral Reform Society not quite having supervision of the two-thirds/one-third result. What happened on the results that were in the Government’s favour? Did the Electoral Reform Society have a view on that? Why should one give more credence to one set of figures than another? Secondly, the noble Baroness has now emphasised twice, with great skill, that one-third approved. I am sure that that is right, but two-thirds did not.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 699 c47GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Councillors Elections Local government Reorganisation Unitary councils Wiltshire Wiltshire County Council West Wiltshire District Council North Wiltshire District Council Salisbury District Council Kennet District Council Wiltshire Council
- Legislation
- Wiltshire (Structural Change) Order 2008
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:29:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_446881
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_446881
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_446881