Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Geddes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 21 February 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Wiltshire (Structural Change) Order 2008.


Wiltshire (Structural Change) Order 2008

I am most grateful to the noble Baroness. I have just two points. First, on the ““favourable”” statistics that she cited, if I can call them that—and she is quite right to cite them in the Government’s favour—she mentioned the remark about the Electoral Reform Society not quite having supervision of the two-thirds/one-third result. What happened on the results that were in the Government’s favour? Did the Electoral Reform Society have a view on that? Why should one give more credence to one set of figures than another? Secondly, the noble Baroness has now emphasised twice, with great skill, that one-third approved. I am sure that that is right, but two-thirds did not.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c47GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Councillors Elections Local government Reorganisation Unitary councils Wiltshire Wiltshire County Council West Wiltshire District Council North Wiltshire District Council Salisbury District Council Kennet District Council Wiltshire Council
Legislation
Wiltshire (Structural Change) Order 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk