Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Yvette Cooper (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 21 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking (Special Provisions) Bill.


Banking (Special Provisions) Bill

We have set that out repeatedly. Clearly, the accounts will need to be set out in the normal way. The accounts of Northern Rock will need to meet all the ordinary accounting practices. It is right that that should be so. We have also repeatedly made it clear that the Government guarantees apply to Northern Rock and not to Granite. Again, it is right that that should be the case and that is the arrangement that has been set in place. It is right to think that the appropriate way to conduct the audit is the method I mentioned. To ask the Bank of England to conduct a separate audit would not be appropriate. That is not the Bank's area of expertise; it is not a professional independent auditor but a central bank. Interestingly, the amendment would not require an independent audit of Northern Rock within three months because it applies to clause 6, whereas the draft order that we have published would be made under clause 3. The amendment would therefore not achieve the intentions of the drafters.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
472 c631 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountability Audit Assets Banks Competition Building societies Bank of England Freedom of information Liability Government assistance Office of Fair Trading Nationalisation Northern Rock Granite
Legislation
Banking (Special Provisions) Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk