Proceeding contribution from Philip Dunne (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 21 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking (Special Provisions) Bill.
Banking (Special Provisions) Bill
It is revealing to learn that the hon. Gentleman is an expert not only on matters of faith but on global securitisation. As he has criticised the hon. Member for Twickenham (Dr. Cable) for raising the subject of Granite, perhaps he will expand on the final sentence of the technical note from the Treasury which states:"““Northern Rock is not liable for the Granite bonds and bondholders have no access to Northern Rock's assets.””" If that is the case, why is it that Northern Rock not only controls all the cash flowing into Granite, but has an obligation to top up assets and the seller's share that it holds in Granite?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 472 c642
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Audit Assets Banks Competition Building societies Bank of England Freedom of information Liability Government assistance Office of Fair Trading Nationalisation Northern Rock Granite
- Legislation
- Banking (Special Provisions) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:55:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447501
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447501
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447501