Proceeding contribution from Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 21 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking (Special Provisions) Bill.
Banking (Special Provisions) Bill
Very little time is left, so I just want to make one particular point. We ought to put the amendments in context. They probe the reality of what the Government are doing. This is not aimed simply at safeguarding commercial interests or the interests of the taxpayer. The main priority of all this secrecy and all this rush is to safeguard the political interests of this Government. They know very well that if freedom of information was allowed, we would find out exactly what had gone on over the past few months. We would know how incompetent and disgraceful their behaviour has been. We would learn something else over the next few months. The Government have set this so that it will go— It being one hour after the commencement of proceedings on the Lords amendments, Mr. Deputy Speaker put forthwith the Question, pursuant to Order [19 February]. The House divided: Ayes 277, Noes 167.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 472 c647
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Audit Assets Banks Competition Building societies Bank of England Freedom of information Liability Government assistance Office of Fair Trading Nationalisation Northern Rock Granite
- Legislation
- Banking (Special Provisions) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:55:36 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447530
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447530
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_447530