Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Beamish (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 February 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Medals (Armed Forces Personnel).


Medals (Armed Forces Personnel)

I agree with my hon. Friend. Anyone who has met amputees at Headley Court or Selly Oak would find it hard tell those people that they did not need recognition for the horrific wounds that they have suffered. Another argument that has been put is that the medal would be divisive. However, all medals are divisive. Certainly, gallantry medals are—people have opinions on whether others should or should not receive them. Clearly, good conduct medals or even service award medals such as the OBE or MBE are divisive because people have opinions on whether others should receive them. I note that the Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, General Sir Timothy Granville-Chapman, has a KCB and a CBE, as does the Chief of the General Staff, Sir Richard Dannatt. I am sure that those awards were well deserved, but some people would feel that they should not have been given. I do not think that divisiveness is a good reason for not awarding medals to such individuals, and I do not think that they would have refused to accept those medals on the ground that they were divisive in relation to those people who did not get similar awards.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
472 c184WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Armed forces Casualties Iraq Medals Military decorations Afghanistan
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk