Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Michael Connarty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 27 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Amendment) Bill.


European Union (Amendment) Bill

That is a helpful intervention. I have every confidence, because I do not only speak in this Chamber; I follow these matters up with Ministers—that is what Back Benchers do. The Minister is aware that some people in other countries see themselves as more federalist and are more willing to submit the idea that the phrase—even in English—““Parliaments contribute to”” is a description of how they must act at all times, whereas we do not, this Minister does not, and, I believe, our Government do not. In relation to ““shall””, we were certainly worried about the Bill of Rights. On how we should proceed now, we must accept that, in the negotiation procedure that created the treaty, there was some room for Euro-fudge. What we must be is ““UK-firm”” against the Euro-fudge, or we will end up in a position where, in practice, other Governments and other Parliaments will expect us to act as though we were compelled. That is why I continue to raise the matter, not only on behalf of my Committee members, but on behalf of Parliament. We want our Ministers to be firm. The Opposition Front Benchers want to hear how they will be firm. If they are not firm enough, I hope and believe that my Committee and this House will remain determined to put some backbone into the negotiations.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
472 c1174 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Constitutions EU law European Union European communities EU integration Referendums Sovereignty Treaties Treaty on European Union UK membership of EU
Legislation
European Communities Act 1972
European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
Bill of Rights 1689
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk