Skip to main content

1-20 of 6,497 results for subject:Constitutions

Type

-
Early day motions (38)
+ Legislation (58) + Acts (4)
-
Public acts (4)
+ Bills (14) + Public bills (14)
-
Government bills (4)
+ Private members' bills (10)
-
Ballot bills (2)
-
Presentation bills (6)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (40)
-
Statutory instruments (40)
+ Members' contributions (5,023)
-
Business questions (174)
-
Maiden speeches (8)
-
Oral answers to questions (431)
-
Oral question time interventions (6)
+ Oral questions (450)
-
Prime Minister's questions (66)
-
Topical questions (3)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (4,132)
+ Parliamentary committees (137) + Committee proceedings (54)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (4)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (45)
-
Select Committee reports (43)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (12)
-
Select Committee written evidence (35)
+ Parliamentary papers (265)
-
Command papers (40)
-
Consultation papers (3)
-
Deposited papers (102)
-
House of Commons papers (87)
-
House of Lords papers (23)
-
Impact assessments (2)
-
Treaties (4)
-
Unprinted papers (11)
-
White papers (10)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (250) + Debates (144)
-
Adjournment debates (32)
+ Committee proceedings (54)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (4)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (45)
-
Debates on select committee reports (6)
+ Legislative debates (34)
-
Debates on bills (34)
+ Monarch's speech debates (10)
-
Queen's speech debates (10)
-
Opposition days (5)
-
Questions for short debate (8)
+ Petitions and observations (7)
-
Observations on petitions (4)
-
Paper petitions (3)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (82) + Oral statements (41)
-
Business statements (5)
-
Ministerial statements (35)
-
Written statements (41)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,473)
-
Business questions (174)
+ Oral questions (450)
-
Prime Minister's questions (66)
-
Topical questions (3)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Written questions (848)
+ Petitions and observations (7)
-
Observations on petitions (4)
-
Paper petitions (3)
+ Research briefings (48)
-
Commons Briefing papers (46)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Topical (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether Cornwall has a constitutional status within the UK over and above its status as a county council.

Asked by
James Cleverly (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 September 2026
Reference
20121
House
House of Commons

Extensive violence targeted some religious minorities in 2025. Tensions continued in 2026. The UK has called for accountability and an inclusive transition.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
CBP-10429

My Lords, UK officials remain in contact with the Government of Zimbabwe, civil society and other stakeholders as part of our ongoing engagement on this matter. The ambassador raised these issues yesterday with senior officials at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. However, constitutional amendments are a sovereign legislative matter for Zimbabwe. However, freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association are essential to democracy. We continue to monitor reports of harassment and stress the importance of transparent, inclusive and lawful processes.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c2342
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that response, but does he realise that the constitutional changes proposed will mean that the people of Zimbabwe will no longer elect their president, the electoral commission will be abolished, judicial appointments will become very unsafe, and there will be many more changes, all of which are anti-democratic? This is coupled with continued brutality, beatings, torture and imprisonment against opposition figures and those in civil society. I am glad that our ambassador has

been having meetings, but can we have an assurance that he will speak out more strongly against the tyranny of the ZANU-PF regime, which rules by terror and threat of terror and is using these corrupt political processes to change the constitution and stay in power? Is it not time, finally, for a radical reappraisal of the United Kingdom Government’s engagement with SADC and the African Union to impress on them that only when we get free and fair elections throughout Africa and corruption is tackled will there be sustainable economic growth and social development in Africa?

Asked by
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c2342
House
House of Lords

There are a lot of questions there, but I will set out the position as clearly as I can. We share the concerns that have been highlighted in the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission’s report, that the constitutional amendment public consultations —to which the noble Baroness refers—were highly managed, with limited space for dissenting voices, civil society, and the media. I should also say that the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission is an agency of the Zimbabwean Government. We continue to urge that the constitutional reform processes are inclusive, transparent, and fully consistent with democratic principles and the rule of law. I spoke to the ambassador this morning, and he raised these issues yesterday.

On speaking out more strongly, frankly, the Government’s view is that 20 years of megaphone diplomacy did not get us anywhere, and we are now in the business of engaging, though we do not underestimate the concerns that the noble Baroness is raising.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c329
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by declaring that my British wife is also an African Zimbabwean. My father-in-law, who as a young man taught Robert Mugabe, resisted Mugabe’s regime with humour and disparagement. The Zimbabweans have a sophisticated understanding of democracy, which is their cultural tradition. Their democratic sentiments were eloquently expressed in the protests that accompanied Mugabe’s steps to appoint himself president for life. The symbol of the protests was a little red card held aloft. It signified that politics is a game that must be played according to the rules, which Mugabe had violated. It behoves us—

Asked by
Viscount Hanworth (Labour; Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c329
House
House of Lords

Question!

Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c329
House
House of Lords

The question will come. It behoves us to support this spirit of democracy, and to prevail upon other African members of the Commonwealth to exert pressure upon this regime. Might I ask the Minister—

Member
Viscount Hanworth (Labour; Crossbench)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c329
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry that I cannot match my noble friend’s commitment to humour and disparagement as a tool for democracy today. I take seriously what he says about the importance of democracy, and it is no secret that we have a long

people-to-people relationship with the people of Zimbabwe, not all of which reflects terribly well on the UK. We will continue to build those relationships.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c329
House
House of Lords

My Lords, ZANU-PF has justified extending the term of the president, and giving him a third term, on the grounds that he is “doing a good job”. It has also said that not having elections from the people, but in parliament, will save money and reduce the risk of violence, which we know is mostly perpetrated against the people by ZANU-PF. What is the price of democracy? Does it not show that ZANU-PF has utter contempt for democracy, and how can we challenge it to reverse its decisions?

Asked by
Lord Bruce of Bennachie (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c330
House
House of Lords

There is an active civil society in Zimbabwe. My noble friend Lord Collins visited last year, and we will continue to work with stakeholders, including the Zimbabwean Government. We welcome the president’s re-engagement efforts, and the progress on economic reform, but we understand the concerns about these constitutional reforms as proposed, and we will continue to advocate about that.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister probably knows that Zimbabwe is rather keen to rejoin the Commonwealth. Could it be explained to President Mnangagwa that the chances of doing so will be much improved if he stands down after two terms, since the Commonwealth on the whole—it does not always work—prefers presidents of two terms rather than indefinite terms?

Asked by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c330
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord regularly raises the Commonwealth, and I appreciate its importance. There was a Commonwealth assessment mission in 2023, and we would welcome another assessment mission. In the end, it will be a matter for the Secretary-General to make a recommendation, and for all members of the Commonwealth to take a view.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I have said on previous occasions, my diocese of Southwark is linked with four of the five Anglican dioceses in Zimbabwe, and I have visited our link dioceses on many occasions. I note that the Zimbabwe Council of Churches has called this week for the withdrawal or amendment of the Bill currently before the Zimbabwean parliament. Would the Minister advise the House what the reaction has been of neighbouring states to this latest development in the governance of Zimbabwe and its wonderful people, so poorly served by those currently in power?

Asked by
Bishop of Southwark (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c330
House
House of Lords

I thank the right reverend Prelate for his question. If he will forgive me, I do not think I should speak on behalf of the other states around Zimbabwe, but I have made clear what this Government’s view is on these proposed constitutional changes, and we shall continue to make that case.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened carefully to what the Minister has had to say. These changes are profoundly undemocratic, extending the

current presidential mandate and abolishing the elections, with violence and intimidation at the public meetings when it was discussed. What I have heard from the Minister is lots of “consultation” and “listening carefully”, but I have not heard any condemnation in what he had to say.

Asked by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c330
House
House of Lords

I have not used the words “consultation” or “listening carefully”. I have said that we will engage with the Zimbabwe Government on these issues, and the ambassador raised our concerns as recently as yesterday. I am sorry, that is a complete travesty of what I have said.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c331
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does my noble friend the Minister agree that Zimbabwe’s president is intrinsically involved in the criminality at the heart of the state, the machine of that criminal enterprise being the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, oiled by a business elite—many of whom are the sons and daughters of the white and Asian elite who supported sanctions-busting under the racist regime of Ian Smith—and unchecked today by the independent judiciary, accountability and professional scrutiny that continue to exist in South Africa, enabling the state of Zimbabwe to either sponsor or turn a blind eye to massive gold and tobacco smuggling?

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c331
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend. We recognise the economic reforms undertaken by the Government of Zimbabwe and the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, including—this is an important point that I have not made before—the signing of the IMF staff-monitored programme, as an important step towards greater macroeconomic stability, which, frankly, is greater than it was under Mugabe. However, for these reforms to be sustainable, tackling corruption must remain a central part of the reform agenda. We are very clear about that.

Answered by
Lord Lemos (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c331
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a former resident of Zimbabwe, I ask what is being done in terms of working with other countries on representations to the Zimbabwean Government. Surely it is better that we work not alone but with many other countries right around the world.

Asked by
Lord Hayward (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
855 c331
House
House of Lords