Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Joan Ruddock (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 28 February 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Refuse Collection.


Refuse Collection

If the Department has made a study of it, I have not got the information. I will write to the hon. Gentleman. I was not thinking so much about anaerobic digestion, but more about conventional incineration and, of course, combined heat and power, which is a very positive technology that we see a great deal of on the continent. Let me look at the other questions that I want to respond to. The hon. Member for Beckenham referred to a freedom of information request that had been successful on a consultation that I understood her to say was on alternate weekly collections. We have not done a consultation on AWC that has been subject to an FOI, so I am not sure how she was able to substantiate her claim that there has been a huge increase in fly-tipping. The AWC collections were around long before there was a documented increase in fly- tipping, which I acknowledge that there has been. Our view in relation to fly-tipping, like all crimes for which there is a requirement to report—Flycapture, which collects the data, is very new—is that we will see an increase. We have also seen much more activity by local government in tackling fly-tipping and in taking forward prosecutions.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
472 c350WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Costs Biodegradability Landfill Domestic waste Incinerators Local government Pollution Powers Waste management Waste disposal Nappies
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk