Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 March 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill.
Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill
The exception referred to in the amendment, ““but not limited to””, is, by and large, less persuasive than the ones that have been mentioned specifically. Does my noble friend agree?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 699 c889
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Compensation Criminal proceedings Administration of justice Homosexuality Fines Discrimination Pornography Prostitution Miscarriages of justice Paedophilia Young offenders Sexuality
- Legislation
- Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:37:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_450919
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_450919
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_450919