Proceeding contribution from Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 3 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty) (No. 8).
Business of the House (Lisbon Treaty) (No. 8)
This is yet another motion that slightly amends the timetable. Although my hon. Friend has acknowledged that that involves meeting hon. Members' desire to protect the time for the referendum debate, how far are the Government consulting the usual channels? Were Conservative Front Benchers or Liberal Democrat Front Benchers approached about this latest motion, and was there an attempt to agree it? Surely the point of timetabling in this House is to enable the maximum opportunity for debate involving the widest range of opinions in order to achieve proper scrutiny. Have the Government presented yet another unsolicited business motion, or was there at least an attempt to reach an agreement first?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 472 c1461
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- European Union Parliamentary procedure Parliamentary scrutiny Treaties Treaty of Lisbon
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:35:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_451107
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_451107
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_451107