Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Hunter (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 March 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Woodhead Rail Route.


Woodhead Rail Route

The hon. Lady is making a strong case—it would appear that there is a trans-Pennine alliance of hon. Members from all parties in support of her comments. Further to what the hon. Member for Altrincham and Sale, West (Mr. Brady) said, does she agree that the key thing to establish is that we are not opposed to the principle of National Grid using the tunnel if—it is perhaps a big ““if””—there were some way for it to route cables through the tunnel that allowed train services to commence at some future date? I do not know how realistic the hon. Gentleman's proposition is, but we ought to establish firmly the principle that if there is a way around the problem so that National Grid was able to run its cables and retain the potential for future use, we are not against it in principle. We should ensure that the route remains a viable proposition for the future.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
473 c65WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Construction Freight Passengers Tunnels Civil engineering Northern Way Woodhead line
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk