Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ivan Lewis (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 March 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Older People's Rights (Health Care).


Older People's Rights (Health Care)

May I seek clarification on the hon. Gentleman's comment on differential rights in the same establishment? As I understand it, the problem that we are all keen to sort out is that publicly funded individuals in a private establishment ought to be covered by the Human Rights Act, but are not. On Parliament's and the Government's intentions, self-funders were never going to be covered by the Human Rights Act, which leads us to a debate on how to protect them. However, as I understand it, the problem is not that there is one group of people in a home who are protected while others are not; it is about public commissioning in private homes. Parliament and Government intended that those who were publicly funded should be covered by the Act even if they live in a private home, so we do not have an apartheid system in any single establishment. It is simply that a group of people who we thought ought to be covered are not covered at the moment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
473 c133WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Care homes Hospitals Health services Human rights Hospital wards Hospital beds NHS Older people Mental health services Standards Joint Committee on Human Rights
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk